检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞杨[1] 戴好运 倪传斌[2] Pang Yang;Dai Haoyun;Ni Chuanbin
机构地区:[1]东华大学外语学院,上海201600 [2]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《外语教学》2020年第5期38-43,共6页Foreign Language Education
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“语用认知视角下的词汇同义关系构建研究”(项目编号:16CYY061)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:本文采用眼动追踪技术,考察在不同类型的句子语境中,语义联系和语用推理机制对词汇同义关系在线加工的影响。研究结果表明:1)语境熟悉度高的情况下,同义词对目标词概念的启动效应不显著,因此语义联系不影响词汇同义关系的在线加工;2)典型同义词对词汇加工和句子理解均无显著影响,说明词汇同义关系无法通过默认推理在线构建;3)特殊语境信息和同义词的交互作用显著,呈现特殊同义词降低了目标词和实验句的理解难度,这表明同义关系通过整合词汇编码意义和关联语境信息进行在线构建,语用推理是词汇同义关系的在线构建的认知机制。The present study adopts eye tracking to examine the effect of semantic association and pragmatic inferential mechanism on the online processing of lexical synonymy in different sentence contexts.The results show that:1)the priming effects of synonyms are not significant if they occur in familiar contexts,which indicate that the semantic association does not affect the online processing of lexical synonymy;2)The occurrence of typical synonyms does not affect the processing of lexical and sentence meaning.This suggests that lexical synonymy can not be constructed through default reasoning;and 3)There is significant interaction between specific contextual information and synonyms,and the occurrence of special synonyms reduces the processing effort of target words and sentences.The result further indicates that lexical synonymy is inferred through integrating lexical encoded meaning and relevant contextual information,and pragmatic inference is the cognitive mechanism of the online construction of lexical synonymy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248