检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王巨 WANG Ju(Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601)
出 处:《浙江万里学院学报》2020年第5期55-59,共5页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
摘 要:《政府信息公开条例》将公共企事业单位列为法定的信息公开的义务主体,但由于公共企事业单位并非组织法意义上的行政主体,缺乏外部约束保证法定责任的落实。原《条例》为解决这一难题,规定公共企事业单位信息公开纠纷可以参照条例提起行政诉讼,而新修订的《条例》将救济方式改为向有关主管部门或机构申诉。但是,这一修改并不必然导致法院从此不再对公共企事业单位信息公开进行审查,法院仍然可能继续接收公共企事业单位信息公开的行政诉讼。而诉讼中公共企事业单位的主体资格认定问题是处理案件的首要问题。The“Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information”lists public enterprises and institutions as the statutory obligatory subjects for information disclosure.However,since public enterprises and institutions are not administrative entities in the sense of the Organic Law,they lack external constraints to ensure the implementation of legal responsibilities.In order to solve this problem,the original“Regulations”stipulated that information disclosure disputes of public enterprises and institutions can bring administrative litigation with reference to the regulations,and the newly revised“Regulations”changed the relief method to appeal to the relevant competent department or agency.However,this modification does not necessarily cause the court to no longer review the public disclosure of public enterprises and institutions.The court may still continue to receive administrative lawsuits for public information disclosure of public enterprises.The issue of determining the subject qualification of public enterprises and institutions in litigation is the most important issue in handling cases.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15