检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柯美高 KE Meigao(School of Business,Huanggang Normal University,Huanggang 438000,China)
出 处:《中南财经政法大学学报》2020年第5期125-136,160,共13页Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:本文根据贸易自由化对消费污染的作用机理构建理论模型,并利用我国2000~2015年生活二氧化硫的省级面板数据实证检验贸易自由化对我国消费污染的影响机制。理论研究表明:消费领域贸易自由化的环境效应由规模效应、技术效应和贸易引致的结构效应组成;环境规制越严格的国家或地区的消费侧肮脏品的消费越少,其消费减排技术越高。实证研究显示:就生活二氧化硫而言,规模效应使我国的消费污染水平上升,技术效应和贸易引致的结构效应使我国的消费污染水平下降,贸易总体上降低了我国的消费污染水平;中国不存在生活二氧化硫的环境库兹涅茨曲线,但消费领域“污染天堂”假说在中国成立。According to the unique mechanism through which trade liberalization affects consumption pollution,this paper constructs the theoretical model,and tests the mechanism that trade liberalization affects consumption pollution in China by using Chinese provincial panel data of household sulfur dioxide from the year 2000 to 2015.The theoretical findings show that the environmental effects of trade liberalization in the field of consumption are composed of scale effect,technique effect and trade-induced composition effect;and the countries or regions with stricter environmental regulations consume the less consumption of CGP goods,and their technology of reducing consumption pollution emission is better.The empirical results show that as far as household sulfur dioxide is concerned,scale effect improves the level of consumption pollution in China,while technique effect and trade-induced composition effect lower the level of consumption pollution in China,and on the whole,trade reduces the per capita emission of household sulfur dioxide in China.There does not exist an environmental Kuznets curve(EKC)of household sulfur dioxide in China,but the“Pollution Haven”hypothesis(PHH)of in the field of consumption is established in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.218.86