检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国能源研究会能效与投资评估专业委员会,北京100053 [2]中国宏观经济研究院能源研究所,北京100038 [3]中能世通(北京)投资咨询服务中心,北京100053
出 处:《中国能源》2020年第9期43-47,共5页Energy of China
摘 要:“一带一路”境外工业园区是中国企业对外投资的主要组成部分,也是中国与沿线国家产能合作的重要空间载体。为推动“一带一路”境外工业园区绿色发展,本文在对境外工业园区的发展成效分析的基础上,通过构建绿色发展指数方法,对60个境外工业园区的绿色发展水平进行统一评价和横向量化比较,分析了不同区域、不同类型境外工业园区绿色发展的差异性,比较了绿色指标对园区绿色发展指数贡献值的差异,总结了境外工业园区绿色发展面临的艰巨性和复杂性,提出了未来境外工业园区绿色发展的重点和关键,以期为政策制定和园区绿色实践提供参考。Overseas industrial parks in BRI are the major component of Chinese enterprise’s foreign investment,and it is also an important carrier of China’s capacity cooperation with the countries along BRI.In order to promote the innovation-driven development and green development of parks,this paper firstly analyzes the development effect of the overseas industrial parks.Secondly,it takes 60 overseas industrial parks as samples,to carry out the unified quantitative evaluation and horizontal comparative analysis of green development level by establishing a green development index(GDI)system.We then use this method to analyze the differences and emphasis of green development of various overseas industrial parks in different regions,and compare the contribution of each individual indicator to the GDI value of the park,so as to provide reference for the green development policy-making and green practice of overseas industrial parks in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81