无创呼吸机和有创呼吸机治疗重症哮喘患者的对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of Noninvasive Ventilator and Invasive Ventilator in the Treatment of Severe Asthma Patients

作　　者：姜岩 JIANG Yan(Haicheng Central Hospital,Liaoning Haicheng 114200)

机构地区：[1]海城市中心医院,辽宁海城114200

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2020年第17期121-122,共2页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:对比评价无创呼吸机、有创呼吸机在重症哮喘治疗上的效果。方法:抽取2018年1月~2019年4月本院收治的60例重症哮喘患者作为观察对象,依据不同的治疗措施将60例患者分为对照组与观察组。对照组30例用有创呼吸机治疗,观察组30例用无创呼吸机治疗,对比血气指标、症状改善时间、不良反应发生率。结果:观察组血气指标优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组症状改善时间短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在重症哮喘治疗中,无创呼吸机治疗效果优于有创呼吸机,特别是在血气指标中,改善效果显著,且还可缩短治疗时间,减少不良反应发生率。Objective:To compare and evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive ventilator and invasive ventilator in the treatment of severe asthma.Methods:60 patients with severe asthma admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to April 2019 were selected for this study.According to the grouping principle(different treatment measures),60 patients were divided into control group and observation group.30 patients in the control group were treated with invasive ventilator,and 30 patients in the observation group were treated with non-invasive ventilator.Blood gas indexes,symptom improvement time and adverse reaction incidence were compared.Results:The blood gas index of the observation group was better than that of the control group(P<0.05).The improvement time of symptoms in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of severe asthma,the effect of non-invasive ventilator is better than that of invasive ventilator,especially in the blood gas index,the improvement effect is significant,and also can shorten the treatment time,reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

关 键 词：无创呼吸机 有创呼吸机 重症哮喘 血气指标 

分 类 号：R562.25[医药卫生—呼吸系统]