检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史新广[1,2] 冯成志[2] Shi Xinguang;Feng Chengzhi(Applied Technology College,Soochow University,Suzhou,215325;School of Education,Soochow University,Suzhou,215123)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学应用技术学院,苏州215325 [2]苏州大学教育学院,苏州215123
出 处:《心理科学》2020年第4期801-807,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:教育部人文社科项目(17YJA880019);江苏省教育厅高校哲社科学研究基金重点项目(2018SJZDI188)的资助。
摘 要:采用80.8神经类型量表对1263名大学生进行施测,从灵活型、安静型、兴奋型和抑制型四种典型的神经类型中各随机抽取20名被试,要求其完成执行功能中抑制、刷新和转换三个任务,进而考察神经类型与执行功能的关系。结果发现:(1)抑制加工绩效随神经活动平衡性的提高而提高,但不受神经活动强度和灵活性的影响;(2)刷新加工效率随神经活动强度的增强而提高,但与神经活动平衡性和灵活性无关;(3)转换加工能力随着神经活动灵活性的提高而变强,但与神经活动强度和平衡性无关。Pavlov divided people into four neural types:flexible type,quiet type,excitatory type and inhibitory type based on intensity,balance and flexibility of the neural activity process.Individuals of different neural types have different physiological characteristics,and neural type also affects individual’s behaviors and cognitive processing patterns.However,the relationship between neural type and cognitive processing is unclear.The focus of our research is the relationship between neural type and executive function.Before the normal experiments,1263 college students were tested using 80.8 Neural Type Test Scale.20 students per each type(flexible type,quiet type,excitatory type and inhibitory type)were randomly selected from the subjects(80 subjects in total).The 80 subjects were asked to do inhibition(Go/No-go paradigm),updating(N-back paradigm)and shifting tasks(digit-letter shifting paradigm).In inhibition task,a 4(neural type,between-subject variable:flexible type vs.quiet type vs.excitatory type vs.inhibitory type)×3(task type,within-subject variable:baseline task vs.simple inhibition task vs.complex inhibition task)mixed design was adopted.In updating task,a 4(neural type,between-subject variable:flexible type vs.quiet type vs.excitatory type vs.inhibitory type)×4(task difficulty,within-subject variable:1-back vs.2-back vs.3-back vs.4-back)mixed design was adopted.In shifting task(digit-letter shifting paradigm),a one-way ANOVA was adopted,with neural type as the independent variable,and the switching cost as the dependent variable.The results revealed that:(1)In inhibition task,the main effect of neural type was significant in reaction time.Quiet type group was significantly smaller than that of excitatory type group(p<.05),and the accuracy of quiet type group was also higher than that of excitatory type group(p<.01).In accuracy and reaction time,the main effect of task type was significant.The interaction between neural type and task type was not significant.(2)In updating task,the main effect of neural
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.111.22