完善法官问责标准研究  

On Improving the Standards of Judge Accountability

作　　者：冯泽宇 潘海忠 FENG Zeyu;PAN Haizhong(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,201701,China;Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou,730000,China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院,上海201701 [2]甘肃政法大学,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《滁州职业技术学院学报》2020年第3期49-53,58,共6页Journal of Chuzhou Polytechnic

基　　金：上海政法学院2019年“一流研究生教育引领计划”(研究生教育教学与培养建设)。

摘　　要：我国法官问责标准在立法实践中,主要存在两种方式,即违法责任制与错案责任制,地方司法机关对法官追责也存在不同标准。在司法实践中,法官责任追究存在轻视法官行为、缺乏公开透明的现象。基于立法与司法的背景下,构建“行为中心主义”的法官问责标准具有科学性与合理性,应当构建以法官不当行为为中心、主观过错为辅助、错案结果为补充的法官责任标准体系。In the legislative practice,there are two main kinds of accountability standards for judges in China,the responsibility system for illegal cases and that for misjudged cases,and there are also different standards for local judicial organs to pursue the responsibility of judges.In judicial practice,there also exist such phenomena as contempt for judges and lack of openness and transparency.Based on the background of legislation and judicature,it is scientific and reasonable to construct the judge accountability standard of"behavior-centralism".A judge responsibility standard system should be built with judges'improper behavior as the center,subjective fault as the auxiliary,and results of misjudged cases as the supplement.

关 键 词：法官责任 行为中心主义 法官行为 问责标准 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]