检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚鹏 YAO Peng(Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Motor System Energy Saving Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200063,China)
机构地区:[1]上海电机系统节能工程技术研究中心有限公司,上海200063
出 处:《电机与控制应用》2020年第9期66-72,共7页Electric machines & control application
摘 要:在利用改进绕组设计对电机进行双速或多速节能改造时,存在一些特殊工况要求不同转速时的能效尽可能接近,这就需要对定子绕组进行特殊设计以实现2种转速条件下效率最优。针对该需求,对比了3种单绕组双速电机实现方案,对比发现反向换相法在2种极对数情况下均能保持较高的基波绕组系数,进一步利用有限元方法研究了不同节距和绕组匝数对电机运行性能的影响,并提出了最优的绕组设计方案。以1台5.5 kW、4极电机为例,利用所提方法进行4/6极绕组设计并进行试验验证,结果表明2种转速下电机效率基本一致,验证了所提设计方法的可行性及有效性。Currently,two-speed or multi-speed energy-saving remanufacturing of motor system is generally realized by improved design of stator winding.But the energy efficiency at different speeds should be close to each other so that the optimal efficiency can be achieved under different rotating speeds in some special conditions.In response to this demand,three single-winding two-speed schemes of stator winding are compared,and it is found that the reverse commutation method can maintain a relatively high fundamental winding factor for both pole pair numbers.The effects of different pitches and winding turns on the motor performance are analyzed by finite element method,and the optimal winding design scheme is proposed.Taking a 5.5 kW,4-pole motor as an example,the proposed method is used to carry out a 4/6 pole winding design and experiment validation.The results show that the motor efficiency is generally the same under the two speeds,which verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed design method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.10.46