简论元人对《宋史》的评说  

An analysis of scholars’comments on History of Song Dynasties in the Yuan Dynasty

作　　者：王宇[1] WANG Yu

机构地区：[1]浙江省社会科学院哲学研究所

出　　处：《国际社会科学杂志（中文版）》2020年第3期159-167,7,13,共11页International Social Science Journal（Chinese Edition）

基　　金：浙江省社会科学院“中国哲学史”重点学科的资助

摘　　要：《宋史》全书问世后,立刻引起了以黄溍、宋濂、杨维祯为代表的元代学者的重视,他们在认真研读了《宋史》以后,肯定了其史料价值,并将其运用于对宋代史的研究和史籍勘误。同时,他们也指出了《宋史》的不足之处,一是史料采择、史实考证不够精审;二是列传失收重要人物甚多;三是史法体例不正(主要指辽金宋三朝的各为正统)。元人的《宋史》研究在史料占有上超过了明人,对《宋史》的纠谬补正也为明代《宋史》研究指明了方向。因此,对元代《宋史》研究进行梳理,不仅可以弥补《宋史》研究从成书到明代之间的一段空白,对丰富当代的宋史研究、拓展史学史研究的视野,也有一定的借鉴意义和启示价值。The publication of History of Song Dynasties immediately attracted the attention from such representative scholars as Huang Jin(1277-1357),Song Lian(1310-1381)and Yang Weizhen(1296-1370)in the Yuan Dynasty(1271-1368).They approved its value of the historical materials included,and applied it to their studies of the history of Song Dynasties and the correction of historical records.Meanwhile,they also pointed out the shortcomings of the book:1)selection of historical materials and textual research on historical facts were not reviewed sufficiently;2)there missed too many important figures’biographies;3)the method,the stylistic rules and layout were incorrect(above all,Liao,Jin and Song,three dynasties,all had been regarded as orthodox).The research on the history of Song Dynasties in the Yuan Dynasty surpassed that of the Ming Dyansty(1368-1644)in terms of possession of historical materials,and the correction of the book also pointed out the direction for Ming.By making clear the scholars’studies in the Yuan Dynasty,therefore,it can not only fill a gap between the publication of the book and the Ming Dyansty,but also inspire scholars today and expand their horizons.

关 键 词：《宋史》 杨维祯 黄溍 史学史研究 史实考证 宋史研究 宋濂 史料价值 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]