傅斯年与山东龙山文化研发关系述论  

On the Relationship between Fu Sinian and Shandong Longshan Culture Research and Development

作　　者：马亮宽 Ma Liangkuan(Institute of the Canal Studies,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng Shandong,252059)

机构地区：[1]聊城大学运河学研究院,山东聊城252059

出　　处：《山东师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期97-107,共11页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：作者主持研究的国家社会科学基金项目“历史语言研究所与现代中国学术体制的建构研究”(11BZS002)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪30年代,傅斯年领导历史语言研究所考古组对山东龙山城子崖、日照两城镇等相继开展发掘。通过对这些遗址发掘所获古器物,尤其是出土的大量黑陶器的研究证实,黑陶器物所代表的山东龙山文化与中原西部以彩陶等器物为代表的仰韶文化是中国上古时代两个独立的系统。傅斯年经过研究得出结论:东西两个系统,夷与商属于东系,夏与周属于西系,两系统东西对峙,相争相灭,便形成了中国的三代史。山东龙山文化从中国上古文化源流上否定了中国文化西来说,同时为傅斯年研究中国上古史、构建夷夏东西学说理论提供了史实证据。In the 1930 s, Fu Sinian led the archaeological team of The Institute of History and Language in excavating Chengziya and Rizhao’s Liangchengzhen in Shandong Province. Through the study of the ancient artifacts, especially a large number of black pottery unearthed from these sites, it is confirmed that the Longshan culture represented by black pottery and the Yangshao culture represented by painted pottery in the west of the central plains are two independent systems in the early ancient China. Fu Sinian concluded that the two systems, in which Yi and Shang belong to the eastern system, and Xia and Zhou belong to the western system, confronted, fought and eradicated each other, resulting in the history of the three dynasties. The Longshan culture of Shandong Province negates the eastern system in the origin of the early ancient Chinese culture and provides historical evidence for Fu Sinian’s study of the early ancient Chinese history and the construction of the theory of the eastern and western doctrines of Yi Xia.

关 键 词：傅斯年 吴金鼎 城子崖遗址 两城镇遗址 山东古迹研究会 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]