学术论文引言中人际元话语的跨学科对比研究  

A Cross-disciplinary Comparative Study of Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Article Introductions

作　　者：祁亚伟 马静[2] QI Yawei;MA Jing(School of General Education and Foreign Languages,Anhui Institute of Information Technology,Wuhu 241010,China;Foreign Languages School,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽信息工程学院通识教育与外国语学院,安徽芜湖241010 [2]东华大学外语学院,上海201620

出　　处：《上海理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期201-208,共8页Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2019年安徽信息工程学院专业核心课程建设项目(2019xjkcjs46);2018安徽省优秀青年人才支持计划项目(gxyq2018135)。

摘　　要：基于Hyland的元话语理论和Swales的引言“创建研究空间”模型,以管理学和化学学科语料对比分析了软硬科学学术论文引言中人际元话语的分布情况,并尝试从体裁交际目的视角来解释这些异同。结果发现,作为同一体裁的两学科学术论文引言虽然在人际元话语的语步分布上展现出了很强的一致性,但在除了凸显语之外的元话语资源使用数量上,管理学引言均多于化学引言。这些一致与差异既符合同一体裁共同的显性交际目的,也体现了不同学科属性规约下各自隐性交际目的实现方式间的差异。Based on metadiscourse theory and CARS model postulated by Swales,this study makes a comparative metadiscoursal analysis of RA introductions in management and chemistry,aiming at the similarities and differences between soft and hard sciences from the perspective of communicative purposes.It is found that the distributions of interactional metadiscoursal resources in RA moves in both disciplines demonstrate a strong correlation while metadiscoursal resources in management RA introductions outnumber its chemistry counterpart except boosters.The correlation and differences can be well explained by the overt communicative purposes realized by their similar generic structures and covert ones respectively achieved and shaped by their disciplinarities.

关 键 词：学术论文引言 人际元话语 交际目的 学科属性 

分 类 号：H315[语言文字—英语]