焦虑症患者采用心理护理结合生物反馈进行治疗的临床疗效  

Clinical efficacy of psychological nursing combined with biofeedback in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorder

作　　者：邓友梅[1] 莫妙霞 凌瀚[1] 卢月芝 DENG Youmei;MO Miaoxia;LING Han;LU Yuezhi(Psychometric Room,Department of Medical Psychology,Third People's Hospital of Zhaoqing,Zhaoqing 526060,China)

机构地区：[1]广东省肇庆市第三人民医院医学心理科心理测量室,广东肇庆526060

出　　处：《中国医药科学》2020年第16期242-244,248,共4页China Medicine And Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨拟定心理护理+生物反馈方案对焦虑症患者进行治疗后获得的临床效果。方法选择我院2017年6月~2018年3月收治的132例焦虑症患者作为实验对象;随机数字表法分组后拟定每组治疗方案;参照组(66例):拟定常规心理护理方案展开;实验组(66例):拟定心理护理+生物反馈方案展开;就组间躯体因子评分、精神因子评分、HAMA评分结果以及干预满意度展开对比。结果治疗前,实验组躯体因子评分为(11.26±2.16)分,治疗后为(8.21±1.07)分;治疗前,精神因子评分为(16.53±2.32)分,治疗后评分为(9.06±0.22)分;治疗前,HAMA评分为(25.11±5.13)分,治疗后评分为(7.23±3.02)分;治疗前,参照组躯体因子评分为(12.07±2.65)分,治疗后为(10.31±1.16)分;治疗前,精神因子评分为(16.83±3.07)分,治疗后评分为(11.21±1.27)分;治疗前,HAMA评分为(26.17±4.89)分,治疗后评分为(10.65±4.19)分。治疗前,实验组焦虑症患者躯体因子评分、精神因子评分以及HAMA评分结果同参照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,实验组躯体因子评分、精神因子评分以及HAMA评分结果均低于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组焦虑症患者干预满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论焦虑症患者于临床接受心理护理+生物反馈治疗后,利于躯体因子评分、精神因子评分、HAMA评分结果的降低,干预满意度的提升,最终对于焦虑症患者早期转归,奠定基础。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of developing a regimen of psychological nursing and biofeedback on the treatment of patients with anxiety disorder.Methods 132 patients with anxiety disorder admitted and treated in our hospital from June 2017 to March 2018 were selected as the experimental subjects;After the patients were divided into groups by using the random number table methods,the therapeutic regimen was developed for each group;For the reference group(66 patients),routine regimen of psychological nursing was developed and carried out;for the experimental group(66 patients),the regimen of psychological nursing and biofeedback was developed and carried out;the results of somatic factor score,psychiatric factor score,HAMA score and intervention satisfaction were compared between the groups.Results In the experimental group,the somatic factor score before and after treatment were(11.26±2.16)points,(8.21±1.07)points respectively;The psychiatric factor score before and after treatment were(16.53±2.32)points,(9.06±0.22)points respectively;and the HAMA score before and after treatment were(25.11±5.13)points,and(7.23±3.02)points respectively.In the reference group,the somatic factor score before and after treatment were(12.07±2.65)points,(10.31±1.16)points respectively;The psychiatric factor score before and after treatment were(16.83±3.07)points.And(11.21±1.27)points respectively;and the HAMA score before and after treatment were(26.17±4.89)points,(10.65±4.19)points respectively.Before treatment,the difference in the results of somatic factor score,psychiatric factor score and HAMA score of patients with anxiety disorder in the experimental group was not statistically significant than those in the reference group(P>0.05);After treatment,the results of somatic factor score,psychiatric factor score and HAMA score in the experimental group were lower than those in the reference group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The intervention satisfaction of patients with anxiety

关 键 词：焦虑症 心理护理 生物反馈 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R473.74[医药卫生—护理学]