检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋晓哲[1] 石春雷[1] 刘东升 SONG Xiao-zhe;SHI Chun-lei;LIU Dong-sheng(Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Xuzhou 221006,China)
出 处:《中华疾病控制杂志》2020年第9期1079-1082,1105,共5页Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基 金:中华预防医学会慢性病与免疫预防实践探索项目(2018―2019)。
摘 要:目的了解冠心病患者对流行性感冒(简称为流感)及疫苗的认知情况,并对社区健康干预措施在提高此类人群流感认知及疫苗接种率中的效果进行评价.方法采用随机整群抽样的方式,将徐州市鼓楼区7家社区卫生服务中心在管冠心病患者随机分为干预组与对照组,干预组给予多频次社区健康干预,对照组不作任何处理.比较干预前后对流感知晓率及干预、对照两组疫苗接种率的异同.结果干预组1711例、对照组1805例参与了此次研究;干预后,干预组对流感及其疫苗的认知程度普遍有所提升(均有P<0.05),总知晓率由15.84%上升至53.59%(χ^2=518.734,P<0.001);干预组与对照组流感疫苗接种率基线数据分别4.32%、4.76%,两者差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.391,P=0.532);经干预后,干预组流感疫苗接种率为7.89%,高于本组基线数据(χ^2=43.373,P<0.001),也高于对照组在项目结束时接种率(1.88%,χ^2=69.258,P<0.001);对照组在项目结束时流感疫苗接种率为1.88%,较本组基线(χ^2=36.125,P<0.001)与干预组基线接种率均低(χ^2=17.583,P<0.001).结论徐州市鼓楼区冠心病患者流感疫苗的接种率不高,后期应针对冠心病患者进一步加大流感相关知识的宣教,社区健康干预不失为提高冠心病患者流感知晓率与疫苗接种率的有效手段.Objective To assess the awareness about influenza and vaccines among patients with coronary heart disease(CHD), and to evaluate the effects of community-based public health interventions in increasing the influenza vaccination rate and the awareness about flu. Methods Patients with CHD in community health service centers in Gulou District were divided into two equal groups by using random cluster sampling, which were group(IG) and the control group(CG). Multi-frequency community-based public health interventions(e.g. health education) were implemented in IG, and CG was not treated. The awareness about influenza among patients with CHD was compared before and after interventions in IG, and the vaccination rate of CG was also compared after interventions. Results A total of 1 711 and 1 805 people were included in IG and CG, respectively. After the intervention, the awareness of influenza and its vaccines increased in IG(all P<0.05), for example, the total awareness rate increased from 15.84% to 53.59%(χ~2=518.734,P<0.001).The baseline data of influenza vaccination rate in IG and CG were 4.32% and 4.76%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them(χ~2=0.391, P>0.05). After interventions, the vaccination rate increased to 7.89% in IG, which was higher than that before interventions(χ~2=43.373, P<0.001). The vaccination rate decreased to 1.88% in CG(χ~2=69.258, P<0.001), which was lower than the baseline rate(χ~2=36.125, P<0.001), and also much lower than IG after interventions(χ~2=17.583, P<0.001). Conclusions The flu vaccination rate among patients with CHD in Guolou District of Xuzhou City is not high. The community-based public health intervention is an effective means to improve the flu awareness rate and vaccination rate among patients with CHD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46