检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周毛卡[1,2,3] Zhou Maoka(School of Ethnology and Sociology,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu,610041,Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]西南民族大学民族学与社会学学院、西南民族研究院,四川成都610041 [2]哈佛大学燕京学社 [3]密歇根大学人类学系
出 处:《民族学刊》2020年第5期74-83,148,149,共12页Journal of Ethnology
基 金:中国国家留学基金、国家社科基金重大委托项目西藏项目“藏区牧民定居化后的文化适应——以黄河首曲玛曲县为例”(XZ1212);西南民族大学教育教学改革项目的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文围绕国内外学界对青藏高原游牧地区“牧民定居”工程的讨论,按年代顺序对上个世纪,特别是新中国成立以来有关藏族游牧地区“牧民定居”及游牧社会文化研究的主要著述进行了梳理、述评和比较。文章认为,老一辈研究者对藏族游牧地区社会文化的论著为这一领域的研究打下了坚实的基础并极具开拓意义。最近十几年来的论著则主要围绕“草场承包”“生态移民”“牧民定居”等政策,实施以来的相关牧民社会文化变迁等,在论文数量和研究范围方面有了大幅的提高,研究人员俱增,但专门著作与反思性文章相对缺乏。就“牧民定居”研究来说,由于受调研地海拔较高、交通不便等客观条件的影响和调查者自身语言、时间、刻板印象等主观因素的限制,很多研究未能深入。因而进一步指出,要做好“牧民定居”研究就必须了解和结合整个青藏高原游牧地区的社会文化,并进行长时期的参与观察研究。Focusing on the domestic and foreign academic discussions on the pros and cons of the“Nomadic Settlement Project”in Tibetan pastoral areas,this article intends to sort out,review and compare the scholarship on this topic by placing it within a larger historical context,particularly that since the founding of People s Republic of China.Earlier scholarship on this topic laid a solid foundation,and many works have pioneering significance.In the past two decades,the academic research mainly focused on issues related to the implementation of policies,such as“grassland contracts”,“ecological migration policy”,“nomadic settlement project”etc.,and the social and cultural changes of the herdsmen.Although it has become more diverse in terms of research topics,there is a relative lack of reflective and in-depth fieldwork research,as well as theoretical breakthroughs.As far as the research on the“Nomadic Settlement Project”is concerned,with the progress of the project and the deepening of the research,the attitudes of domestic and foreign scholars towards the settlement of herdsmen have changed from a completely positive attitude or completely negative one.However,there is a general skepticism and critical scholarship on the“Nomadic Settlement Project”among foreign scholars.Putting the“settlement project”of Tibetan herdsmen within a world framework,taking it as a contemporary interpretation and regional case of previous unsuccessful settlements of herdsmen,and in combining this with their different professional backgrounds,foreign scholars generally hold a negative or critical attitude towards the“nomadic settlement”.After observing many problems within the social cultures of the herdsmen in settlements,domestic scholars turned from holding initially totally positive views to becoming more reflective,and put forward more relevant countermeasures and suggestions according to actual investigation.However,we find a convergence over concern for the lives of Tibetan pastoralists both among domestic
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7