《草木传》非蒲松龄著作述论  

Research on Pu Song-ling not being the author of Caomu Zhuan

作　　者：杨海儒[1] YANG Hai-ru(Pu Songling Museum,Zibo 255120,China)

机构地区：[1]蒲松龄纪念馆,山东淄博255120

出　　处：《蒲松龄研究》2020年第3期257-278,共22页Study on Pu Songling

摘　　要：清嘉庆间《草木传》(又名《药会图》)抄本,因好事者作伪,冠以聊斋著作,被路大荒1962年以待考作品收入其整理的《蒲松龄集·附录》中。1980年间,淄博医药界发文介绍《草木传》为蒲松龄作品并广为宣传。为此,笔者于1987年发文辨证,以清抄本《药会图序》考证其“作者应为山西人郭秀升”,又于1995年再撰文述及之,以抛砖引玉。其后数十年间,引发数省多人参与研讨,并结论一致,肯定《草木传》作者非蒲松龄,实为山西人郭秀升。而今见几部新编聊斋著作集中仍附录之,有必要再作述论,以达聊斋学界共识。The manuscript of Caomu Zhuan(also known as Yaohui Tu)between Jiaqing of Qing Dynasty was regarded as Pu Songling's work.In 1962,as a work to be verified,it was included in the appendix of Pu Songling collection by Lu Dahuang.Zibo medical circle widely publicized it as Pu Songling's works in 1980.For this reason,in 1987,based on The Preface of Yaohui Tu of the Qing Dynasty's manuscript,I've concluded that its author should be Guo Xiusheng from Shanxi Province,and elaborated this view again in 1995.In the following decades,scholars in many provinces have discussed that the author of Caomu Zhuan is not Pu Songling,but Guo Xiusheng from Shanxi.However,it is still attached to the newly compiled works of Liaozhai.It is necessary to make further comments to reach the consensus of the academic circles of Liaozhai.

关 键 词：草木传 药会图 蒲松龄 郭秀升 路大荒 

分 类 号：H312[语言文字—英语]