检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林钧跃[1] Lin Junyue(Credit Academic Committee,Chinese Association of Market Development,Beijing 100192,China)
机构地区:[1]中国市场学会信用学术委员会,北京100192
出 处:《征信》2020年第9期1-7,共7页Credit Reference
摘 要:对不同性质的社会信用体系模式进行区分,分别定义了政府和市场两种不同性质的社会信用体系,并给出了划分标准。无论是政府性质的社会信用体系,还是市场性质的社会信用体系,均有明显的利弊,都不适合于我国直接采用。在对治理型社会信用体系进行简单探讨的基础上,提议在“十四五”规划期调整现行体系的设计和推进方向,包括将广义社会信用体系进行技术性拆分等若干条建议。This article conducts a classification of social credit system models of different natures and defines two types of social credit system with different nature, namely government-oriented system and market-oriented system, and provides the criteria for the classification of these two systems. Nonetheless, both systems are not suitable for direct adoption in China in that they demonstrate remarkable pros as well as obvious cons. By conducting a preliminary discussion of governance-oriented social credit system, this article proposes to adjust the design and advancement direction of the current system during the 14 th Five-Year Plan period,which includes several suggestions, such as conducting technical split of the broad social credit system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171