批评法院审判行为的限度与规制  

On the Regulation of Illegal Criticize Court Trial

作　　者：谢小剑[1] XIE Xiao-jian(Research Center of Government by Law,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330032,China)

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法治政府研究中心,南昌330032

出　　处：《南昌航空大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第2期58-65,共8页Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2019年江西省社会科学“十三五”规划项目“以审判为中心改革中证据制度的完善”(19FX06)。

摘　　要：当前,我国未有效规范批评法院审判行为的界限,导致法院司法公信力严重受损。十八届四中全会提出要规范媒体报道司法,惩戒藐视法庭权威的行为。未来批评法院应当以尊重司法权威,不损害审判独立、妨碍司法公正的实现为原则。同时,批评不应当有侮辱、诽谤的言论,主观是否具有恶意、客观上该言论是否具有思想或意见表达价值,是界定批评限度的重要限度。对于正在审理的个案也应当允许批评,但批评不得造成“明显而即刻的危险”,不能作“倾向性报道”而形成“舆论审判”。对于滥用批评权的行为应当积极审慎予以事后规制,同时法院有必要及时、高效地回应批评,厘清错误报道,合理地引导舆论。At present,the criticism of the court trial is lack of adequate standards,leading to the loss of the court’s judicial credibility.The fourth plenary session of the 18th Communist Party of China proposed to regulate the media reports judicial,punish to the act of contempt of court authority.In the future,criticism of the court should be appropriate to respect the judicial authority,and shall not damage the judicial independence,to prevent the realization of judicial justice as the principle.At the same time,criticism should not be an insult,slander,whether subjective is malicious,whether it has a malicious,objectively,whether the statement has a thought or opinion expression value,is the important measure to define the limits of criticism.Criticism should be allowed for the cases being heard,but the criticism should not cause the“obvious and immediate danger”,and can not become a“trend report”to form a“public opinion trial”.The court for the illegal and critical behavior should be actively and carefully regulated,at the same time,it is necessary to promptly and efficiently respond to criticism,to clarify the error reporting,and reasonably guide public opinion.

关 键 词：批评 审判行为 独立 责任 

分 类 号：D916.2[政治法律—法学]