检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓治国 王琦 李建中[2] DENG Zhiguo;WANG Qi;LI Jianzhong(Shanxi Luqiao Bridge Tunnel Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Shuozhou 036005,China;School of Civil Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
机构地区:[1]山西路桥桥隧工程有限公司,朔州036005 [2]同济大学土木工程学院桥梁工程系,上海200092
出 处:《结构工程师》2020年第4期52-57,共6页Structural Engineers
摘 要:国内外对纵向地震输入下矮塔斜拉桥的支承体系进行过许多研究,结果表明,不同支承体系对矮塔斜拉桥的纵向地震响应有较大的影响,但在支承体系对多塔矮塔斜拉桥横向地震响应影响方面的研究很少。以一座典型多塔矮塔斜拉桥为背景,针对多塔矮塔斜拉桥结构特点,分别比较了塔梁固接、塔墩分离,塔墩固接、塔梁分离,塔、墩、梁固接三种不同支承体系横桥向地震反应特点,研究了采用摩擦摆支座减小多塔矮塔斜拉桥横向地震反应的效果。Many studies have been carried out on the support system of the extra-dosed cable-stayed bridge under longitudinal seismic input at home and abroad.The results show that different support systems have a great influence on the longitudinal seismic response of the extra-dosed cable-stayed bridge.However,there is little research on the influence of support system on transverse seismic response of multi-tower extra-dosed cable-stayed bridge.Based on the structure characteristics of a typical multi-tower extra-dosed cable-stayed bridge,this article compares differences of transverse seismic response of three different supporting systems.and the effect of using the double spherical bearing to reduce transverse seismic response of multi-tower dwarf tower cable-stayed bridge is studied.
分 类 号:U448.27[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程] U442.55[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.238.74