联合应用尿液干化法与尿沉渣镜检法进行白细胞检验的临床价值  

The clinical value of combined urine drying method and urine sediment microscopy in leukocyte examination

作　　者：廖博[1] 王志杰[1] Liao Bo;Wang Zhijie(Daqing Longnan Hospital (The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College), Daqing, Heilongjiang 163453)

机构地区：[1]大庆龙南医院(齐齐哈尔医学院第五附属医院),黑龙江大庆163453

出　　处：《中外女性健康研究》2020年第19期178-179,共2页Women＇s Health Research

摘　　要：目的:研究白细胞检验中应用尿液干化法与尿沉渣镜检法时对检验结果的影响。方法:在2017年12月至2019年9月,选取106例于本院收治的需要检验尿液中白细胞的患者为研究对象,随机分为研究组和参照组,各53例。研究组联合应用尿液干化法与尿沉渣镜检法,参照组采取尿液干化法,对比两组误诊率、漏诊率以及白细胞检出率。结果:经检验,研究组的误诊率、漏诊率低于参照组,有统计学差异(P<0.05);另外对两组患者的白细胞检出率进行对比,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:在尿液中进行白细胞检验时应用尿液干化法与尿沉渣镜检法可降低误诊率以及漏诊率。Objective:To study the influence of urine drying method and urine sediment microscopy on the results of leukocyte examination.Methods:From December 2017 to September 2019,106 patients admitted to our hospital who needed to examine the white blood cells in urine were selected as the study objects and randomly divided into the study group and the reference group,with 53 cases each.In the study group,urine drying method was combined with urine sediment microscopy,while in the reference group,urine drying method was adopted.The misdiagnosis rates,missed diagnosis rates and leukocyte detection rates of the two groups were compared.Results:After testing,the rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis in the study group was lower than that in the reference group,with statistical differences(P<0.05);in addition,the white blood cell detection rates of the two groups were compared,and there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The application of urine drying method and urine sediment microscopy can reduce the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate in the leucocyte examination of urine,which has application value.

关 键 词：尿液干化法 尿沉渣镜检法 白细胞 

分 类 号：R44[医药卫生—诊断学]