检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄建[1] 李闯[1] HUANG Jian;LI Chuang(Design Institute of Civil Engineering&Architecture of DUT Co.,Ltd.,Dalian 116023,China)
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学土木建筑设计研究院有限公司,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《水运工程》2020年第10期52-56,共5页Port & Waterway Engineering
摘 要:针对船舶射流作用下码头护底损坏的工程问题,分析比较了PIANC推荐的荷兰方法和德国方法,以及TheRockManual推荐的算法。得出结论:荷兰方法对块石护底的设计较为适用,德国方法在均质土壤或级配土壤冲刷问题上有较好的适用性,重力式码头可适当增加护底冲刷流速计算值。基于研究成果,以非洲某港口项目为例,采用荷兰方法对重力式码头护底进行了设计。In view of the engineering problem caused by the damage of the gravity quay protection unit under the action of the ship jet,the Dutch method and the German method recommended by PIANC,as well as the algorithm recommended by The Rock Manual,are analyzed and compared.It is concluded that the Dutch method is more suitable for the design of block stone bottom protection,and the German method has good applicability in the problem of homogeneous soil or graded soil erosion;gravity wharves can appropriately increase the calculated value of the bottom protection erosion velocity.Based on the research results,taking a port project in Africa as an example,the Dutch method is used to design the gravity quay protection unit.
分 类 号:U656.1+11[交通运输工程—港口、海岸及近海工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.251.231