检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾焕银[1] JIA Huanyin(School of Law,Shandong University,Weihai,Shandong 264209)
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2020年第4期132-140,共9页Journal of Shandong Police College
基 金:国家社科基金项目“法律惯例理论与法治中国建设研究”(项目编号:17XFX011);中国人民公安大学基本科研业务经费重大项目“警察执法方法理论与实践问题研究”(项目编号:2018JKF101)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:警察职权不仅是实现警察目的、从根本上落实和实现警察任务的基本举措,还是联系警察组织法和警察作用法的枢纽环节。在职权目的、主体和表达方式等问题上,我国警察职权立法都有自身特点,但困于警察权概念上的模糊认识,仍然存在一系列问题。基于对警察职权与相关概念的比较认识,应当通过将警察权力锚定在“一种特殊的行政权”这一逻辑上,在综合立法模式下,来修订现有警察职权规定并确定其具体内容。但着眼未来,要采纳组织法和作用法分立模式,制定“人民警察组织法”和“警察职权行使法”,才能在整体上逐步走出在立法上仰赖组织法,新时代警务需要作用法来撑持的当代警察职权规定的实践困境。Police authority is not only the basic measure in realizing police objectives and implementing police tasks,but also the key link between law on police organization and law on police function.In terms of the purpose,subject and means of expression,legislation of police authority has its own characteristics,but there are still a series of problems caused by vague understandings of the concept of police authority.Based on the comparative understanding of police authority and related concepts,the existing police power should be revised and its specific content should be determined by anchoring police authority in the logic of“a special administrative power”under the comprehensive legislative mode.However,in view of the future,we should formulate the Law on People’s Police Organization and Law on Exercise of Police Authority by adopting the separation mode of organization law and function law,so as to gradually get out of practical dilemma of the contemporary police authority that are supported by function law in the new era.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.173.30