检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王长斌[1] Wang Changbin
机构地区:[1]澳门理工学院博彩旅游教学及研究中心
出 处:《港澳研究》2020年第3期39-48,94,95,共12页Hong Kong and Macao Journal
摘 要:澳门回归祖国之前,其幸运博彩监管制度,基本上局限于批给制度。回归之后,澳门特区政府制定了多项法律法规,由此建立了一个幸运博彩业的监管框架,并确立了一系列的监管制度,例如资格审查、禁止限制竞争、内部控制、反洗钱、博彩中介人须领取执照等。经过近二十年的努力,澳门幸运博彩业的监管制度不断完善,取得了长足进步。但是,历史的包袱以及执法偏软等缺陷仍然制约着博彩业的健康发展。Before Macao returned to China,its casino gaming regulatory system was basically equivalent to the concessionaire system.After the return,the Macao SAR government formulated a number of laws and regulations which formed a regulatory framework for the casino gaming industry,and introduced a series of specific practices,such as eligibility check,prohibition of anti-competitive practices,internal control,anti-money laundering,and licensing gaming intermediaries.After nearly two decades of hard work,the casino gaming regulatory system has been continuously evolved and greatly improved.However,historical burdens and lax law enforcement still hinder the healthy development of the gaming industry in Macao.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43