赋权还是去权:民国律师与民众日常法律咨询分析——以天津《大公报·法律解答》为例(1932—1937)  

Empowerment or Disempowerment:An Analysis of Lawyers and Daily Legal Consultation of Citizens in the Republic of China——A Case Study of Ta Kung Pao·Legal Consultation in Tianjin(1932-1937)

作　　者：王静[1,2] WANG Jing(Institute of History,Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences,Tianjin 300191,China;The Center for Tianjin Historical and Cultural Study,Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences,Tianjin 300191,China)

机构地区：[1]天津社会科学院历史研究所,天津300191 [2]天津社会科学院天津历史文化研究中心,天津300191

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期82-88,共7页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：作为民众咨询法律问题的一个渠道,《大公报》"法律解答"栏目较为详实地记载了民众日常生活中所关心的法律问题及律师的针对性解答。通过对1932—1937年栏目内容的分析可以发现,国民政府法律改革中所出现的漏洞恰恰是民众亟需解决的问题。在赋权与去权的博弈中,政府和律师分别作为法律的制定者和执行者,试图将普及法律知识与政治规训结合,以达到国家治理之目的;而民众作为法律的承受者,则希望在新法推行中寻求自身最大利益。As a channel of legal consultation for the public,Ta Kung Pao·Legal Consultation detailedly recorded the legal issues concerned by the public in their daily life and the targeted solutions provided by the lawyers.Through the analysis of the column from 1932 to 1937,it can be found that the loopholes in the legal reform by the national government are precisely the issues among people that need to be solved.In the game between empowerment and disempowerment,the government as law-makers and the lawyer as law performers tried to combine popularization of legal knowledge with political discipline to achieve the purpose of national governance;and the people as bearers of the law,hoped to seek their biggest interests in the implementation of new laws.

关 键 词：法律解答 大公报 民众权利 

分 类 号：K263.5[历史地理—历史学]