检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林静 LIN Jing(Liaoning Health Industry Group Fuxin Mine General Hospital,Fuxin 123000,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第25期155-156,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨急性胰腺炎患者通过引流管护理方案进行干预的效果。方法选择66例到我院进行腹腔引流治疗的急性胰腺炎患者分为观察组和对照组,每组33例,分别对两组患者选择采用引流管护理方法和常规护理进行干预,比较两组护理方法的效果。结果经过不同护理后,观察组患者入院7 d内出现引流管不良状况发生率为9.09%(3/33),对照组为42.42%(14/33),两组数据比较,P<0.05;观察组患者的急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHⅡ)、Marshall评分明显比对照组低,两组数据比较,P<0.05;观察组的红细胞压积(HCT)明显低于对照组,两组数据比较,P<0.05。结论引流管护理方案对重症胰腺炎患者进行护理能有效促进患者病症的恢复,降低引流管不良状况的发生率,改善相关临床症状。Objective To explore the effect of intervention in patients with acute pancreatitis through the nursing plan of drainage tube.Methods Sixtysix patients with acute pancreatitis who came to our hospital for abdominal drainage treatment were divided into observation group and control group,with 33 cases in each group.The two groups of patients were selected to use drainage tube nursing methods and conventional nursing methods for intervention,and compare the effects of the two groups of nursing methods.Results After different care,the incidence of poor drainage tube in the observation group was 9.09%(3/33)within 7 days of admission,and 42.42%(14/33)in the control group.Comparison of the two groups'data,P<0.05;the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Score(APACHⅡ)and Marshall Score of the patients were significantly lower than those of the control group.Comparison of the two groups'data,P<0.05;the observation group's hematocrit(HCT)was significantly lower than that of the control group.Comparison of the two groups'data,P<0.05.Conclusion Drainage tube nursing program for patients with severe pancreatitis can effectively promote the recovery of patients'symptoms,reduce the incidence of poor drainage tube conditions,and improve related clinical symptoms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112