检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于水英 YU Shui-ying(Guangzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Guangdong Guangzhou 510410)
机构地区:[1]广州市白云区妇幼保健院,广东广州510410
出 处:《按摩与康复医学》2020年第20期29-31,共3页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察挑刺法治疗小儿积滞的临床疗效。方法:选取2018年7月~2019年11月于本院中医儿科门诊就诊的乳食内积型积滞患儿80例,采用抽签方式分为治疗组和对照组各40例。治疗组予挑刺四缝穴治疗,对照组予小儿推拿治疗。比较两组患儿治疗前后中医症候积分及治疗后疗效。结果:治疗后,两组患者的中医证候评分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且治疗组治疗后的中医证候评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:挑刺法治疗小儿积滞临床疗效更显著,值得临床选择应用。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of Pricking Blood Therapy in treating Children Food Retention.Method:From July^2018 to November 2019,80 children diagnosed with children food retention were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,40 cases for each group.The treatment group were treated with pricking blood therapy at Si-Feng points(EX-UE10),while the control group were treated with pediatric massage.To compare the syndrome score of TCM before and after treatment and the curative effect after treatment.Result:After treatment,the scores of TCM syndromes in both groups were significantly lower than before(P<0.05),and the scores of TCM syndromes in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The total effective rate was higher in the treatment group than in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effect of picking blood in treating children food retention is more significant,which is worthy of clinical choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222