新形势下海峡两岸和平协议:回顾、检视与展望  

The Cross-Strait Peace Agreement under the New Situation:Retrospection,Inspection,and Prospect

作　　者：祝捷[1,2] 徐莹[1] Zhu Jie;Xu Ying(the School of Law and executive director;Ph.D.supervisor of the Research Center for Legal Systems in Taiwan)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]武汉大学两岸及港澳法制研究中心

出　　处：《台海研究》2020年第3期1-10,共10页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies

基　　金：2017年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“采取反分裂国家必要措施的相关法律问题研究”(项目号:17JZD030)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1979年后,两岸虽结束热战,但仍处于内战的延续状态中。为正式结束海峡两岸敌对状态、推动两岸关系和平发展,和平协议应运而生,经历了形成、博弈、发展与变化四个阶段。在岛内因素严重制约和平协议发展的当下,尽管面临来自政治、规范与认同的三重挑战,和平协议仍可基于两岸和平共识,借助岛内发展需求和民意进行重启。因此,大陆可推动和平协议的功能由制度性安排向防火墙协议转变,通过法理共识定位对其功能转变进行规范性确认,运用《反分裂国家法》为和平协议的防火墙功能预设规范底线,从而为和平协议的重启提供有力的制度设计与规范保障。Although armed warfare across the Strait has ceased since 1979,the state of civil war has nonetheless continued.In order to formally end the state of hostility across the Strait and promote peaceful development of cross-Strait relations,signing the Peace Agreement came into discussion and went through four stages:formation,negotiation,development and change.At a time when factors on the island severely restrict the development of the Peace Agreement,despite the triple challenges from politics,regulations,and recognition,the Peace Agreement can still be restarted on the basis of consensus on sustaining peace,with the help of the island’s need for development and public opinion.Therefore,the mainland can promote transformation of the Peace Agreement’s function from an institutional arrangement to a firewall agreement,make normative confirmation of its functional transformation through examining its jurisprudential consensus,and use the Anti-Secession Law to set a normative bottom line for the firewall function of the Peace Agreement,so as to provide a powerful design for the system and standard for restarting the Peace Agreement.

关 键 词：和平协议 两岸关系 和平共识 《反分裂国家法》 

分 类 号：D618[政治法律—政治学] D921[政治法律—中外政治制度]