检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张皓 ZHANG Hao(School of History,Qinghai Normal University,Xining,Qinghai 810016)
出 处:《中国浦东干部学院学报》2020年第5期95-108,共14页Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Pudong
基 金:北京市社科基金项目“治藏主权的恢复:反对外国干涉下之西藏和平解放研究”(17LSB007)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:1947至1951年间,印度以“宗主权”为工具干涉中国治藏主权。在独立前后,印度声称它承认西藏为中国“宗主权”下之“自治领土”。新中国成立前夕,印度宣称“西藏从未承认中国的宗主权”,换句话说西藏承认的是印度的“宗主权”。新中国成立后,印度宣称中国对西藏的“宗主权”是“模糊的”。1950年10月人民解放军发起昌都战役后,印度声称中国对西藏拥有的只是名义上的“宗主权”。印度以所谓“宗主权”挑战中国治藏主权,目的是直接与西藏地方当局交往以图控制西藏,并在时机许可下变西藏为其“保护国”。尽管印度竭力挑战中国治藏主权,但是包括它在内的任何外国均无力阻挡西藏回到中华人民共和国祖国大家庭。From 1947 to 1951,India interfered in China’s sovereignty over Tibet using“suzerainty”as a tool.Around its independence,India claimed to acknowledge Tibet as“autonomous territory”under China’s“suzerainty.”During the fall until the founding of New China,India claimed,“Tibet never acknowledged Chinese suzerainty.”In another word,what Tibet acknowledged was India’s“suzerainty.”After the founding of New China,India claimed that China’s“suzerainty”over Tibet was“unclear.”After the People’s Liberation Army launched the Qamdo Battle in October 1950,India claimed that what China had over Tibet was merely nominal“suzerainty.”The purpose for India to challenge China’s sovereignty with“suzerainty”was to control Tibet through direct interactions with the Tibetan local authority and to change Tibet into its“protectorate”under favorable circumstances.Despite of India’s unreserved efforts to challenge China’s sovereignty over Tibet,no foreign countries including India were able to prevent Tibet from returning to the great family of the People’s Republic of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222