对辩证法的分析性重塑——为博弈论马克思主义者埃尔斯特正名  

The Analytical Reshaping of Dialectics——Justifying Elster as a Game Theory Marxist

作　　者：黄海 桂起权[3] HUANG Hai;GUI Qi-quan(College of Marxism,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China;School of Marxism Studies,Xuchang University,Xuchang Henan 461000,China;School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学马克思主义学院,天津300387 [2]许昌学院马克思主义学院,河南许昌461000 [3]武汉大学哲学学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2020年第5期47-51,共5页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目(2017M620094)。

摘　　要：不少人误以为分析派马克思主义者反对辩证法,其实所反对的只是模糊性的思维方式。埃尔斯特对辩证法的真意比其他分析派的人看得更为真切透彻,他很好地把握了马克思重视辩证法的逻辑合理性的思想。一般人感到难以理解的是“看起来矛盾的东西,在逻辑上怎么能是合理的”?为此,埃尔斯特用现代逻辑工具为“现实矛盾”产生的合情性进行逻辑辩护,对辩证法进行“分析性重塑”。Many people mistakenly reckon that Analytical Marxists oppose dialectics.But what they actually oppose is only the fuzzy way of thinking.Elster saw the true meaning of dialectics more clearly than other Analyticists.He had a good grasp of Marx’s emphasis on the logical rationality of dialectics.What confuses many people is that how things that look contradictory can be logically reasonable?For this reason,Elster used modern logic tools to logically defend the rationality of the emergence of“realistic contradictions”and analytically reshape dialectics.

关 键 词：分析派马克思主义 博弈论 埃尔斯特 黑格尔的“逻辑-辩证还原”现实矛盾 模态逻辑 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]