论案例裁判规则的表达与运用  

The Expression and Application of Case judgment rules

作　　者：张骐[1] ZHANG Qi(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100080)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《现代法学》2020年第5期35-49,共15页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究”(16ZDA068)的阶段成果。

摘　　要：案例裁判规则是案例在司法实践中发挥作用的核心。案例裁判规则的逻辑构成是争议问题和法律解决方案。案例裁判规则与案件事实有无法分割的关联。裁判规则是发现、确证类案的枢纽和类案裁判的重要指引。在实践中被使用最多的裁判规则形式是裁判要点。裁判要点可以作为审理案件的裁判理由,指导性案例的裁判要点还可以作为审理案件的裁判依据。类比推理与演绎推理是运用裁判规则的重要推理方法。在裁判规则的运用中,需要坚持可普遍化原则、合理论证原则及法治原则。Case judgment rules are the core of cases in judicial practice.The logical composition of the case adjudication rule is the dispute problem and the legal solution.There is an inseparable relationship between the rules of case judgment and the facts of a case.The rules of adjudication are the hub of discovering and confirming cases and the important guidance for the judgment of similar cases.In practice,the most used form of judging rules is the main point of judgment.The main points of judgment can be used as the reasons for trial,and the key points of guiding cases can also be used as the basis for judging cases.Analogical reasoning and deductive reasoning are important reasoning methods for the application of judgment rules;we need to guide and standardize the application of analogy reasoning and judgment rules from two aspects.In the application of judicial rules,we need to adhere to the principles of universality,reasonable argumentation and rule of law.

关 键 词：案例裁判规则 裁判规则的表达 裁判规则的运用 

分 类 号：DF920.0[政治法律—国际法学]