“债的一般规范”的识别及其对非合同之债的适用——以《民法典》第468条为中心  

The Identification of“General Norms of Obligation”and its Application to Non-contractual Obligations——Taking Article 468 of the Civil Code as the Core

作　　者：柳经纬[1] 吕辰 LIU Jing-wei;LV Chen

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学 [2]中国政法大学标准与法治研究中心

出　　处：《北方法学》2020年第5期25-35,共11页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“民法典编纂的内部与外部体系研究”(18ZDA141)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《民法典》未设债编,有关债的一般规范被安排在合同编通则部分,并通过第468条的规定适用于非合同之债。债的一般规范与专属合同的规范和其他规范混杂在一起,需要进行识别。非合同之债是一个庞大的群体,包括非合同典型之债和非典型之债,后者还包括公法上的债。债的一般规范对非合同之债的适用,需要从两个方面予以考虑:一是非合同之债的性质,债的性质决定不能适用的,不适用债的一般规范;二是债的一般规范的功能作用,并非所有债的一般规范均可适用于非合同之债。There is no obligation part in the Civil Code,and the general norms of obligation are arranged in the General Rules of Contract,and according to the provisions of Article 468,the above norms can be applied to non-contractual obligations.But the general norms of obligation are mixed with the rules which can be only applied to exclusive contracts and other rules,and need to be identified.Non-contractual obligation is a large group,including non-contractual typical obligations and non-typical obligations,the latter includes obligations in public law.Two aspects should be considered in the application of the general norms of obligation which arranged in General Rules of Contract to non-contractual obligations:firstly,the nature of non-contractual obligations determines that some general norms of obligation cannot be applied;secondly,the function of the general norms of obligation determines that not all of the general norms of obligation can be applied to non-contractual obligations.

关 键 词：民法典 债的一般规范 非合同之债 法律适用 

分 类 号：DF525[政治法律—民商法学]