中国吸引外资研发机构政策的多维量化分析  

Policy research on China’s attracting foreign investment R&D institutions based on multi-dimensional quantitative analysis

作　　者：崔宏轶[1] 张超 耿旭[3] CUI Hong-yi;ZHANG Chao;GENG Xu(College of Social Science,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China;College of Economics and Management,Harbin Institute of Technology,Shenzhen 518055,China;College of Management,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学马克思主义学院,广东深圳518060 [2]哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)经济管理学院,广东深圳518055 [3]深圳大学管理学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《科学学研究》2020年第10期1791-1799,共9页Studies in Science of Science

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划专项项目(GD20SQ33);深圳市哲学社会科学规划课题(SZ2020D010)。

摘　　要：本文选取中国政府于2012-2019年颁布的63份政策文本为研究对象,以创新活动最集中的北京、上海、深圳作为样本,构建政策主体、政策目标、政策对象及政策工具四维研究框架,以政策收集—政策分析—政策评估—政策优化为研究脉络,对中国吸引外资研发机构政策进行量化分析和文本挖掘。研究结果显示:政策扶持更加精准和全面,政策主体之间的关联性增强,机构合作更加广泛和深入;政策目标呈现多维性,重点在于获取创新资源和提升创新能力;政策对象上呈现具体化,重点吸引独立型研发主体,非独立型研发实体逐渐成为重要吸引对象;政策工具上使用环境类工具最多,供给类工具居次,而需求类工具最少。尽管不同城市在政策主体、政策目标、政策对象和政策工具方面均存在差异,但随着政策演进逐渐呈现规范化和全面化的趋势。针对现行中国吸引外资研发机构政策弱点,笔者提出提升政策执行力、完善微观政策等建议。This paper selects 63 policy texts promulgated by the Chinese government from 2012 to 2019 as the research object,and takes Beijing,Shanghai,and Shenzhen which have the most concentrated innovation activities as the research samples,to construct a four-dimensional research framework of policy subjects,policy objectives,policy objects and policy tools,take policy collection-policy analysis-policy evaluation-policy optimization as the research context,quantitatively analyzes and mines China’s policies for attracting foreign R&D institutions.The research results show that the policy support is more precise and comprehensive,the correlation between policy entities is strengthened,and institutional cooperation is more extensive and deeper;the policy objectives are multidimensional,with emphasis on obtaining innovation resources and enhancing innovation capabilities;and the policy target attaches importance to attracting independent companies R&D entities and non-independent R&D entities are gradually becoming important attracted objects;among the policy tools,environmental tools are used the most,supply tools are second,and demand tools are the least.Although different cities have differences in policy subjects,policy objectives,policy objects,and policy tools,as the policy evolves,it gradually shows a trend of standardization and comprehensiveness.In view of the current weaknesses of China’s policy of attracting foreign investment in R&D institutions,the author puts forward suggestions on improving policy execution and improving micro policies.

关 键 词：外资研发机构 跨国公司 科技创新 

分 类 号：F311[经济管理—产业经济]