先秦墨家、法家功利主义技术思想之比较研究  

A Comparative Study of the Utilitarian Technical Thought in Moism and Legalism during the Pre-Qin Period

作　　者：阚迪 陈凡 KAN Di;CHEN Fan(School of Marxism of Northeastern University,Shenyang,Liaoning,110169;School of Marxism of Shenyang Jianzhu University,Shenyang,Liaoning,110168)

机构地区：[1]东北大学马克思主义学院,辽宁沈阳110169 [2]沈阳建筑大学马克思主义学院,辽宁沈阳110168

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2020年第9期86-91,共6页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目“以立德树人为中心的高校思想政治教育工作融合发展模式研究”(项目编号:L17ASZ005);辽宁省高校党建研究青年课题“十八大以来习近平总书记反腐倡廉思想研究”(项目编号:2017GX DJ-A004)。

摘　　要：通过对先秦墨法两家功利主义技术思想在其整体思想体系中功利主义的定位,从作为技术思想"基础"的自然观层面和技术思想的"出发点"层面梳理两家之区别,进而对注重技术标准化与规范化、重视军事技术以及"重功"、"求利"等主要技术思想特征进行比较,剖析出两家功利主义技术思想"名同"而"实不同"之内涵。This paper identifies the utilitarian orientation of technical thought in Moism and Legalism during the pre-Qin period,and discusses the differences between Moism and Legalism from the view of nature as the "foundation" of the technical thought and the "starting point" of the technical thought.Then it compares the main characteristics of technical thought,which include attention to the standardization and normalization of technology,and emphasis on military technology,"civil achievement" and "pursuit of interest".In doing so,this paper analyses the connotation of the utilitarian technical thought between Moism and Legalism which lies in the fact that "the name is the same" but "the substance is different."

关 键 词：先秦 墨家 法家 功利主义 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]