论风险负担规则与合同解除的关系  

The relationship between the rules of risk assumption and contract termination

作　　者：陈冰茹 Chen Bingru(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《市场周刊》2020年第10期154-156,共3页Market Weekly

摘　　要：随着现代合同法理论的发展,合同解除不再以可归责性为要件,在因不可归责于债务人的原因标的物毁损、灭失而至合同目的落空的情形,风险负担规则与合同解除制度发生了适用上的交叉。对此,我国目前采并存模式,此模式在我国应当得到保持。两种制度在适用上存在着时效、法律效果等方面的差异,但是由于风险负担规则存在着更加便捷、效果法定等优势,因此该规则应该被视为合同解除制度的特殊规则优先得到适用。With the development of modern contract law theory,liability is no longer the essential element of contract termination.In the case that the object is damaged or lost due to reasons not attributable to the debtor,the application of risk assumption rules and contract termination system has overlapped.In this regard,the coexistence mode is adopted in China at present,which should be maintained.There are differences in timeliness and legal effect between the two systems in application.However,due to the advantages of more convenience and legal effect,the rules of risk assumption should be given priority as a special rule of the contract termination system.

关 键 词：风险负担 合同解除 可归责性 牵连性 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]