由欧洲人权法院裁判再探代孕中的子女最佳利益原则  

Re-analysis of“Children’s Best Interests”Theory in the Surrogacy Cases Ruling by the European Court of Human Rights

作　　者：王冠男[1] Wang Guannan(Department of Law,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241002,China)

机构地区：[1]皖南医学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《锦州医科大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期8-11,共4页Journal of Jinzhou Medical University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：皖南医学院中青年科研基金项目“代孕过程中妊娠终止的法律分析——以中日韩比较研究为视角”(编号:WKS201405)的研究成果。

摘　　要：经代孕出生的子女利益之保护,建立在亲子关系经法律途径予以认定的基础之上。在代孕中亲子关系认定这一核心难题上,各国主要依据血缘原则、分娩者为母原则、契约原则及子女最佳利益原则等四种基本原则进行裁判,但在具体适用上存在着较大的分歧,尤其是对子女最佳利益原则的基本精神有着不同的理解。本文从欧洲人权法院的相关裁判及见解出发,分析和探讨子女最佳利益原则的准确适用,并期望在其中获得对我国的借鉴意义。The identification of the parent-child relationship legally protects children’s interests in surrogacy.The theory about the relationship between parents and children in surrogacy mainly includes:Blood Relationship Theory,Childbirth Theory,Contract Theory,Children’s Best Interests Theory.Each country apply these theories differently in their own legal system,especially on the understanding of“Children’s Best Interest”theory.Based on the decisions of ECHR,this article expects the enlightenment to China’s Law by discussing the accurate application of“Children’s Best Interests”theory.

关 键 词：辅助生殖 代孕 子女最佳利益 亲子关系 

分 类 号：D97[政治法律—法学]