制度空间、组织竞争和精英决策:一个议程设置的动态分析视角  

Institutional Space,Organizational Competition,and Elite Decision-making:A Dynamic Perspective of Agenda Setting Analysis

作　　者：章高荣 Zhang Gaorong(College of Management,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学管理学院,深圳518060

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2020年第9期72-79,共8页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“我国社会组织立法的困境及出路研究”(编号:17BFX212)。

摘　　要：当前议程设置研究在借用西方理论的过程中忽视了中国的制度特色,而回应式议程设置等本土理论则局限于特定类型。因此,只有从宏观制度变迁、中观官僚组织和微观政策精英的视角切入才能对议程设置有综合性的理解。本文以《慈善法》立法为例,通过打开决策黑箱,发现《慈善法》议程设置的成功在于其宏观上符合国家加强社会领域立法的诉求,法工委和内司委等人大立法官僚机构的成长则提供了组织准备,而立法和行政部门政策精英的推动则是议程设置的直接因素。本研究凸显了在转型背景下,只有回到中国制度和权力的视角才能够加深对议程设置的理解。The institutional characteristics of China in‘agenda-setting’research are disregarded during the borrowing of western theories;unfortunately,the response-oriented agenda-setting process are in response limited in specific types.Only from the perspective of macro-institutional changes,meso-bureaucratic organizations,and micro-policy elites,we can have a comprehensive understanding of agenda-setting in China.This article takes the legislation of the“Charity Law”as an example.By opening the black box of decision-making,the research finds that the success of the charity law agenda-setting is that it is macroscopically in line with the country’s legislative demands for strengthening the social field.Organizational preparation is provided,and the promotion of legislative and executive policy elites is a direct factor in agenda-setting.Therefore,this study indicates that in the context of transition in China,only return to the perspective of Chinese institutions and powers can we deepen the understanding of agenda-setting research.

关 键 词：议程设置 《慈善法》 政治官僚制 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]