检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秀哲 Wang Xiu-zhe(Law School of Liaoning University,Shenyang Liaoning 110136)
出 处:《政法论丛》2020年第5期39-49,共11页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“公共安全视野下个人信息公法保护研究”(16BFX029)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:公民建议是2000年《立法法》设计的社会监督权性质的启动备案审查的权利之一,其弱启动效力在全覆盖备案审查制度建构中依然没有改变,以主动审查推进的备案审查全覆盖取得了一定的实践成果,但依然面临无法克服的全覆盖价值实现困境。结合全覆盖备案审查的功能定位,保护公民法人合法权利是全覆盖的宪法价值目标,若要实现公民基本权利保障的备案审查宪法价值,应该通过有诉必审实现公民建议的全覆盖。而有诉必审的实现,需要在备审分离之下,通过管辖制度、事项筛选分散公民建议的集中行使,并与实质救济制度相衔接。Citizensadvice right is designed first inthe legislation law making in 2000,as in the quality of social supervision review,which is weak effectiveness to start the check in the full coverage for the record review.Even the review according to power has made the advance of the complete coverage of the record review,there are still unable to overcome the implementation difficulties for the whole value.In combination with the functional positioning of the registration and review of full coverage,the protection of the legal rights of citizensis the substantive value goal of full coverage.In order to realize the substantive value of the registration and review,citizens’Suggestions must all accept.How to realize the fully accepted,it is necessary to separate the centralized exercise of citizens’suggestions through the jurisdiction system and matters,and to connect with the substantive relief system.
分 类 号:DF22[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.185.36