从“钓鱼执法事件”反思我国商法独立性和民商立法模式  

Reflection on the Independence of Commercial Law and the Mode of Civil and Commercial Legislation from the Perspective of“Fishing Law Enforcement Incident”

作　　者：刘道云[1] 徐菁 Liu Daoyun;Xu Jing

机构地区：[1]中国金融期货交易所,上海200122 [2]北京智库爱国文化中心,上海201400

出　　处：《行政与法》2020年第9期110-118,共9页Administration and Law

摘　　要："钓鱼执法事件"中存在严重的民商法学理论误区,对搭载行为性质认定错误,混淆了民事行为与商事行为的界限,将民事交易与商事交易混同,暴露了我国现行实质商法的"民商合分折衷"立法模式的缺陷,挑战了我国实质商法的独立性。我国现行民商立法模式易引发观念、实践和理论之间的矛盾与冲突,传统的民商立法范式已不适合我国实情和立法需求,建议我国创设"《商法总则》统领下的实质民商分立"模式,形成中国特色的新型立法范式。There are serious misunderstandings in the theory of civil and commercial law in the"Fishing law enforcement incident".The wrong identification of the nature of the carrying behavior confuses the boundary between civil act and commercial act,confusing civil transaction with commercial transaction.It exposes the defects of the legislative mode of"compromise between civil and commercial law"in China’s current substantive commercial law,and challenges the independence of China’s substantive commercial law.The current legislative model of civil and commercial law in China is easy to cause contradictions and conflicts between ideas,practice and theory.The traditional legislative paradigm of civil and commercial law is no longer suitable for the actual situation and legislative needs of our country.It is suggested that China should create the mode of"separation of substantive civil and commercial affairs under the general principles of commercial law"and form a new legislative paradigm with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：钓鱼执法 实质商法 商法独立性 民商立法模式 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]