检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙鲁云[1,2] 王力 SUN Luyun;WANG Li(School of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,China;Cotton Economic Research Center,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832003,China)
机构地区:[1]石河子大学经济与管理学院,石河子832003 [2]石河子大学棉花经济研究中心,石河子832003
出 处:《干旱区资源与环境》2020年第10期9-15,共7页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基 金:新疆生产建设兵团重大科技项目(2016AA001-4)资助。
摘 要:基于一种新的Malmquist-Luenberge指数测算中国12个棉花主产省份棉花环境全要素生产率及其成分,并运用Dagum基尼系数及其分解方法对中国棉花环境全要素生产率的区域差异及其来源进行研究。结果表明:1)2000-2018年,中国棉花环境全要素生产率平均增长率为0.3%,高于市场全要素生产率,技术进步是中国棉花环境全要素生产率增长的主要来源;2)黄河流域棉区和长江流域棉区棉花环境全要素生产率均高于西北内陆棉区,环境因素对中国各省份棉花全要素生产率的排名有显著影响;3)中国棉花环境全要素生产率的总体差异有缩小的演变趋势,这一趋势在2010年之后表现的更为明显,棉区间差距是中国棉花环境全要素生产率总体差距的主要来源。Based on a new Malmquist-luenberge index,cotton environmental total factor productivity(TFP)and its components in 12 major cotton producing provinces of China were calculated.The regional differences and sources of cotton environmental TFP were further studied by Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition method.The results show that:(1)during 2000-2018,the average growth rate of cotton environmental TFP in China was 0.3%,higher than that of cotton market TFP,and technological progress was the main source of the growth of cotton environmental TFP in China.(2)Cotton environmental TFP in the Yellow River region and Yangtze River region was higher than that in northwest inland region,and environmental factor had a significant impact on the ranking of China’s cotton TFP.(3)The overall difference of China’s cotton environmental TFP had a narrowing trend,which was more obvious after 2010.The gap between cotton regions was the main source of the overall gap of China’s cotton environmental TFP.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117