检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何俊 杜艳丽[1] 邹静 He Jun;Du Yanli;Zou Jing(Mianyang Disease Prevention and Control Center,Sichuan Mianyang 621000)
机构地区:[1]绵阳市疾病预防控制中心,四川绵阳621000
出 处:《云南化工》2020年第10期95-97,共3页Yunnan Chemical Technology
摘 要:目的比较离子色谱法(IC)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)测定水中钾、钠、钙、镁、锂的差异性。方法通过对比分析这两种方法的检出限、精密度、准确度和加标回收率。结果ICP-MS法检出限比离子色谱法低一个数量级,标准样品准确度均在保证值内,精密度RSD均小于5%,加标回收率94%~102%。结论两种方法均能满足质量控制的要求,测定结果之间无显著差异。Objectives Comparison of Ion chromatography(IC)and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy(ICP-MS)were used for determining the potassium,sodium,calcium,magnesium and lithium ions in water.Methods As compared to the detection limit,precision,accuracy and recovery rate.Results The results showed the detection limit of ICP-MS was one order of magnitude lower than that of IC,the precision RSDs were less than 5%,The accuracy of the standard sample is within the standard value,and the standardized recovery rates were 94%~101%.Conclusions the two methods could meet the requirement of quality control,there was no significant difference among the determination results.
关 键 词:钾 钠 钙 镁 锂 离子色谱法 电感耦合等离子体质谱法
分 类 号:X832[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222