检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:严慧洁 YAN Hui-jie(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei,430073)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《韩山师范学院学报》2020年第5期88-94,共7页Journal of Hanshan Normal University
基 金:中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(项目编号:202010706)。
摘 要:“套路贷”犯罪作为一种由民间借贷“变异”而来的新型犯罪,近年来呈现出日益猖獗的态势,并伴随有手段类型多样、过程连贯、牵涉罪名繁多等特点。为严厉惩处该类犯罪,两高两部于2019年4月9日联合发布了《关于办理“套路贷”刑事案件若干问题的意见》,但其中关于罪数的问题规定模糊,容易在实务中出现操作困难、判罚不一的情形。而解决此问题的关键在于厘清“套路贷”行为的性质与组合模式,在此基础上结合罪数理论得出应“择一重罪论处”或“数罪并罚”的结论。The crime of“trick loans”,as a new type of crime“mutated”from private lending,has shown an increasingly rampant trend in recent years,accompanied by various types of means,coherent process,various charges involved and so on.In order to severely punish this kind of crime,on April 9,2019,the Supreme People’s Court,the Supreme People’s Procuratorate,the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Opinions on Handling“Trick Loan”Criminal Cases,but the provisions herein on the number of crimes are vague,resulting in the difficulties in operation and inconsistencies in sentencing in practice.The key to solving this problem lies in clarifying the nature and combination mode of“trick loan”behaviors,so as to draw the conclusion of“choosing a heavier punishment for the most serious crime”or“combined punishment for several crimes”based on the number of crimes theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7