矿业权纠纷裁判的样态与修正--以最高院受理的案件为样本  

The Pattern and Amendment of the Judge of Mining Right Dispute--Taking Cases Accepted by the Supreme Court as Samples

作　　者：张忠民[1] 王雅琪 ZHANG Zhong min;WANG Ya-qi

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第5期45-57,共13页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“新时代生态环境监管体制的法治创新研究”(18VSJ039)。

摘　　要：分析最高人民法院自成立专门环境资源审判机构以来,该机构与第五巡回法庭对有关矿产资源的各类环境资源案件裁判文书。研究发现,我国矿业权纠纷案件呈现出浅层鉴定结论认定标准不一、中层多种流转方式效力界定不清、深层矿业权法律属性不明等问题。为了应对这一困境与争议,应当规范鉴定意见的采纳机制、推进环境司法专门化统一裁判、平衡矿业权行政管理与市场边界,以实践反哺理论,进一步完善我国矿产资源立法体系,从而促进市场有序健康平稳发展。J udgment documents pertaining to a variety of environmental resource-related cases carried out by the dedicated organs for environmental resource trials and the Fifth Circuit Court since the estab-lishment of the former institution by the Supreme People's Court were analyzed.It was found that cases relating to mining rights disputes in China are characterized by problems like inconsistent identification criteria for appraisal conclusions at the superficial level,unclear definition over various circulation ap-proaches at the middle level and unidentified legal properties pertaining to the mining rights law at the deep level.To address these problems,measures like normalizing the acceptance mechanism for apprais-al opinions,advancing specialized,uniform trials for environmental justice,striking a balance between administrative and market boundaries relating to mining rights should be taken,so that these practices can provide positive feedback for theoretical practices and the mining resource legislative system in China can be further improved,thereby promoting an orderly,healthy and steady development of the market.

关 键 词：矿业权 环境司法 最高人民法院 

分 类 号：D922.620.5[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]