刑事简易程序独任审判的实践困境与出路  

The Practical Dilemma andWay Out of the Sole Judge System in Criminal Summary Procedure

作　　者：陈晓宇[1] CHEN Xiao-yu(Legal Practice College,Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice,Shenyang 110161,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁公安司法管理干部学院法律实务系,辽宁沈阳110161

出　　处：《沈阳工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期39-44,122,共7页Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering:Social Science

摘　　要：刑事简易程序对普通审判程序的简化,体现在庭审方式和审判主体的简化上。我国刑事简易程序中的独任审理制度具有范围的特定性、适用的可裁量性、人员的法定性和决定的职权性等特征。法院在依职权决定独任审判时并不对外公开和论证其适用独任审理的具体理由,由此经常会引发独任审理在实践运行中的种种困境和争议。因此,应将独任审判制度的适用范围扩大至适用简易程序审理的全部案件,赋予控辩双方对独任审理提出异议的权利,明确对违反独任审判制度的程序性制裁措施。The simplification of criminal summary procedure to ordinary trial procedure is reflected in the simplification of trial mode and trial subject.The sole judge system in criminal summary procedure in our country has the characteristics of scope specificity,applicable arbitrability,and legal nature of personnel and authority of decision.When the court decides the sole-judge according to its authority,it does not open to the public and demonstrate the specific reasons for its application,which often causes various difficulties and disputes in the practice of the sole judge.Therefore,the scope of application of the sole judge system should be extended to all cases where summary procedure is applied,giving the prosecution and the defense the right to object to the sole-judge,and clarifying the procedural sanctions for violating the sole judge system.

关 键 词：简易程序 独任审判 宣告刑 程序性制裁 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]