检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管荣齐[1] GUAN Rongqi(Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072)
机构地区:[1]天津大学知识产权法研究基地,天津300072
出 处:《中国发明与专利》2020年第10期120-124,共5页China Invention & Patent
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“法院审查专利有效性的制度设计研究”(项目编号:19BFX145)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:我国专利法规定植物新品种属于不授予专利权的客体,而植物新品种的生产方法可以授予专利权,但我国专利审查指南又将植物新品种的生物学生产方法排除在专利客体之外,这不符合植物新品种的品种权与专利权融合、并存的国际趋势,有违专利客体法定原则和我国立法法、专利法的有关规定,不利于我国对基因工程等现代生物技术的开发应用,无法真正保护育种者的主要合法权益。The patent law of China stipulates that new plant variety doesn't belong to patent subject,and the production method of new plant variety can be granted patent right,but the patent examination guide of China also excludes the biological production method of new plant variety from patent subject.The approaches about the patentability of new plant variety in China are not only violate the international trend of integration and coexistence of variety right and patent right of new plant variety,the law principle of patent subject legality and the relevant provisions of the legislative law and the patent law in China,but also are harmful to the development and application of modern biotechnology such as genetic engineering,and the really protection of the main legitimate rights and interests of the breeder of new plant variety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222