检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘峰[1,2] LIU Feng(Foreign Languages College,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;Faculty of Humanities,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学外国语学院,上海200234 [2]上海师范大学人文学院,上海200234
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第6期166-173,共8页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(18CSS024)。
摘 要:近代日本为避免开罪于欧美列强,一直遵循着“协调主义”路线,未曾公然在其政策中使用“亚洲主义”之类的敏感措辞,但其对抗欧美的思想意识却是客观存在的,“协调主义”路线的存在并不能成为否定“亚洲主义”政策化的依据。通过考察可以发现,1918年《中日陆军共同防敌军事协定》正是其政策化的体现。该协定的立案与决策没有按照“禀议制”与“文书轮转制”的惯例进行,而是在田中义一的主导下完成的,其中富含着田中等人的“亚洲主义”思想与总体战构想,带有浓厚的欺骗性与侵略性。In order to avoid conflict with the Western Powers,Japanese government was taking“Harmonious Principle”as their foreign policy direction and claimed that they never adopted“Asianism Policy”in the past.However,it doesn t mean that the thoughts of“Anti-West”never existed at that time.The“Harmonious Principle”was not a negative argument for the policy of“Asianism”actually.By the study,we can ascertain a fact that“Sino-Japanese Military Agreement”in 1918 was a policy of“Asianism”which was decided by Giichi Tanaka(Vice Minister of the Headquarters of the General Staff in 1918).It was a definitely aggressive deceitful policy which was full of“Asianism”thoughts and“Total War”plans of Tanaka.
关 键 词:日本 亚洲主义 政策化 中日陆军共同防敌军事协定
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200