从“假印大案”看清嘉庆朝吏治  被引量:3

Investigation of Officialdom Administration in Jiaqing Period of Qing Dynasty from“Big False Seal Case”

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:薛刚 XUE Gang(The Department of History and Culture,Changchun Normal University,Changchun 130032,China)

机构地区:[1]长春师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130032

出  处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第6期174-182,共9页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基  金:国家社科基金后期资助项目(15FZS010)。

摘  要:清朝嘉庆十四年(1809)底揭发的“假印大案”,是一起因部院堂司官员疲玩怠惰,而致吏商勾结,冒领公帑及物料的大案。工部书吏王书常伙同他人,假传诏旨,十四次冒领户部三库及内务府广储司财物,计值七万余两白银。该案揭示了嘉庆朝官员怠玩、书吏胆大妄为的官场风气。嘉庆皇帝对官员处理上,重财物赔偿,轻处罚,失察官员受处分不久即被任用或捐复。皇帝的色厉内荏成为大案发生、官场腐败怠玩的总根源。“Big False Seal Case”in the 14th year of Jiaqing Period in Qing Dynasty was a major one that the scribes had falsely claimed the public funds and materials due to the collusion between officials and businessmen under the circumstance of the chiefs and the attached officials negligence.Wang Shuchang,a scribe of Gong Bu in the government with others provided the imperial false decree and had falsely claimed the Hu Bu Sanku and Nei Wu Fu s belongings which valued more than seventy thousand liang of silver 14 times.The case revealed the officialdom atmosphere of negligence and recklessness in Emperor Jiaqing s Period.In dealing with the case Emperor Jiaqing stressed property compensation but overlooked punishment of the suspected officials.Soon after punishment these officials were either reappointed or resumed their posts by means of donation in a short while.The emperor s inside weakness in the disguise of outside severity became the very root cause of the big cases and the officialdom corruption.

关 键 词:嘉庆朝 假印大案 吏治 疲玩怠惰 

分 类 号:K249.3[历史地理—历史学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象