腹腔镜辅助下阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术的疗效对照分析  

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic assisted appendectomy and traditional appendectomy

作　　者：许伟江 韩石 何振东 王西川 刘川 Xu Weijiang;Han Shi;He Zhendong;Wang Xichuan;Liu Chuan(Zhongye Hospital of Shanghai City,Shanghai 200941)

机构地区：[1]上海中冶医院,上海200941

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2020年第30期75-76,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

基　　金：上海中冶医院科研基金(YZDXK-2015-08)(项目名称:腹腔镜辅助下阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术的疗效对照分析)。

摘　　要：目的:比较分析腹腔镜辅助下阑尾切除术与传统开腹阑尾切除术的临床疗效。方法:2016年1月-2019年6月收治行阑尾切除术患者260例,按手术方式不同分为两组。试验组采用腹腔镜辅助下阑尾切除术;对照组采用传统开腹阑尾切除术。比较两组临床效果。结果:试验组手术切口长度、术后下床时间、术后肛门排气时间、抗生素使用时间及住院时间均优于开腹组,但手术时间长于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助下阑尾切除术优势明显。Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic assisted appendectomy and traditional open appendectomy.Methods:From January 2016 to June 2019,260 patients with appendectomy were selected and they were divided into the two groups according to different surgical methods.Laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was performed in the experimental group.The control group was treated with traditional open appendectomy.The clinical effects between the two groups were compared.Results:The surgical incision length,postoperative out of bed time,postoperative anal exhaust time,antibiotic use time and hospital stay time in the experimental group were all better than the open appendectomy group,but the operative time was longer than the open appendectomy group,with the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Laparoscopic assisted appendectomy has obvious advantages.

关 键 词：腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹阑尾切除术 疗效对照 

分 类 号：R656.8[医药卫生—外科学]