检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柴杨[1] CHAI Yang(Department of Gastroenterology,Shenyang Fifth People's Hospital,Shenyang 110000,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳市第五人民医院消化内科,辽宁沈阳110000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第27期141-142,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探究健康教育护理对慢性胃炎患者的干预效果。方法本次研究的对象为2014年2月至2017年9月我院收治的200例慢性胃炎患者,采用随机数字法分为观察组及对照组,对照组行常规护理,观察组在此基础上给予健康教育护理干预,对比两组患者临床疗效。结果干预后,观察组患者的治疗效果、护理满意度均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);干预前两组患者的不良情绪评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后两组患者的不良情绪评分均有所下降,且观察组明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论健康教育护理对慢性胃炎患者的干预效果十分显著。Objective To explore the effect of health education and nursing intervention on patients with chronic gastritis.Methods The object of this study is 200 patients with chronic gastritis admitted to our hospital from February 2014 to September 2017.They were divided into observation group and control group by random number method.The control group received routine care.The observation group provided health education and nursing intervention on this basis,and compared the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients.Results After the intervention,the treatment effect and nursing satisfaction of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the bad mood scores between the two groups before the intervention(P>0.05),and the two groups after the intervention,the negative emotion scores of the patients all decreased,and the observation group was significantly lower than the control group.The difference between the groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The intervention effect of health education and nursing on patients with chronic gastritis is very significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28