检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方旭 陈琳[1] 黄宇华[1] 何海航 FANG Xu;CHEN Lin;HUANG Yu-hua;HE Hai-hang(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Section Two,Jilin Cancer Hospital,Changchun,Jilin Province,130012 China)
机构地区:[1]吉林省肿瘤医院胸外二科,吉林长春130012
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2020年第23期130-132,共3页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的探究风险管理在胸外科护理管理中的应用效果评价。方法以2016年4月—2017年4月纳入的40名护理人员作为研究对象,分成对照组和观察组,每组20名,对照组实施常规护理管理,观察组实施风险管理。分析两组护理人员之间的护理效果和护理管理满意度以及会出现的风险事件概率。结果观察组护理人员的满意度显著优于对照组(P<0.05),观察组护理人员风险事件发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组护理人员业务能力、服务态度、沟通能力及责任心等评分显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对医院胸外科护理人员实施风险管理,可以提高患者对护理人员的满意度,值得临床大力采纳。Objective To explore the effect evaluation of risk management in the nursing management of thoracic surgery.Methods 40 nursing staff collected from April 2016 to April 2017 were used as the research object,divided into a control group and an observation group,20 cases in each group,the control group implemented routine nursing management,and the observation group implemented risk management.Analyze the nursing effect and nursing management satisfaction between the two groups of nursing staff and the probability of risk events that will occur.Results The satisfaction of nursing staff in the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05),and the incidence of risk events among nursing staff in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);the nursing staff in the observation group had professional ability,service attitude,and communication scores of ability and sense of responsibility were significantly better than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Implementing risk management for nursing staff in thoracic surgery in hospitals can improve patients’satisfaction with nursing staff and is worthy of clinical adoption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3