机构地区:[1]江苏省徐州医科大学麻醉学重点实验室,徐州221004 [2]无锡市第三人民医院疼痛科,无锡214000 [3]徐州医科大学附属医院疼痛科,徐州221002
出 处:《中国疼痛医学杂志》2020年第9期668-674,679,共8页Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81571066)。
摘 要:目的:在超声引导下脉冲射频(pulsed radiofrequency, PRF)的基础上,比较高能量激光(high intensity laser therapy, HILT)和皮内注射治疗带状疱疹后神经痛(postherpetic neuralgia, PHN)疗效。方法:选取2019年2月至9月我科120例胸背部PHN病人,随机分为脉冲射频组(A组)、脉冲射频联合高能量激光组(B组)、脉冲射频联合皮内注射组(C组),每组40例。记录治疗前、治疗后1周、1月、3月自发性疼痛及触诱发痛的视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分、睡眠质量评分(self-rating scale of sleep, SRSS)、治疗后病人满意度、治疗前及治疗后各时间点的医院焦虑抑郁量表评分(hospital anxiety and depression scale, HADS)、简式Mc Gill疼痛评分(short-form of McGill pain questionnaire, SF-MPQ)、平均每日加巴喷丁使用量、盐酸曲马多使用率及不良反应发生率。结果:与治疗前相比,3组治疗后各时间点的自发性疼痛及触诱发痛的VAS和SRSS评分均降低(P <0.05);与A组相比,B、C组治疗后1周、1月的自发性疼痛VAS和SRSS评分均降低(P <0.05),治疗后各时间点触诱发痛VAS、HADS和SF-MPQ评分以及加巴喷丁使用量均降低(P <0.05);B、C组各时间点的VAS、SRSS、HADS和SF-MPQ评分以及加巴喷丁使用量无明显差异(P> 0.05);3组盐酸曲马多使用率无明显差异(P> 0.05);B组病人满意度高于A、C组(P <0.05);B、C组不良反应发生率低于A组(P <0.05)。结论:超声引导下PRF联合HILT或皮内注射较单独PRF治疗能更好地改善PHN病人的疼痛。Objective:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of high intensity laser therapy(HILT)combined with ultrasound-guided parathoracic nerve pulsed radio frequency(PRF)and intradermal injection in patients with postherpetic neuralgia(PHN).Methods:One hundred and twenty patients diagnosed with thoracic postherpetic neuralgia and over 60 years of age were randomly assigned to the control group A(n=40),the test group B(n=40),and the test group C(n=40).All groups were treated with conventional drug and received ultrasound-guided thoracic spinal nerve pulsed radiofrequency(USG-PRF).High intensity laser therapy was set on the basis of drug therapy and USG-PRF in group B.Intradermal injection was set on the basis of drug therapy and USG-PRF in group C.The curative effect was evaluated at 1 week,1 month,3 months and after the end of the treatment cycle(referred to as post-treatment)by visual analogue scale(VAS),self-rating scale of sleep(SRSS),patients'satisfaction,hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS),short-form of McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ),the average daily dose of gabapentin,and the proportion of patients consuming tramadol hydrochloride.The adverse reactions were also recorded in three groups.Results:VAS and SRSS in all groups were significantly decreased at different post-treatment time points compared with pre-treatment scores(P<0.05).Compared to group A,group B and group C showed significantly lower post-treatment VAS score of spontaneous pain and SRSS at 1 week and 1 month after the treatments(P<0.05),but no significant difference in scores at 3 months(P>0.05).Group B and group C showed significantly lower scores of tactile-induced pain at 1 week,1 month and 3 months compared to group A(P<0.05).Group B and group C showed significantly lower HADS and SF-MPQ score at 1 week,1 month and 3 months compared to group A(P<0.05).The average daily dose of gabapentin were significantly lower in group B and group C compared to group A(P<0.05).No significant difference in the proportion of patients consum
关 键 词:带状疱疹后神经痛 脉冲射频 高能量激光 皮内注射 触诱发痛
分 类 号:R752.12[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...