检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张自强[1] 陈凯荣[1] 钱浩[1] ZHANG Zi-qiang;CHEN Kai-rong;QIAN Hao(Department of Anorectal,Qidong People's Hospital(Qidong Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University),Qidong,Jiangsu Province,226200 China)
机构地区:[1]启东市人民医院(南通大学附属启东医院)肛肠科,江苏启东226200
出 处:《系统医学》2020年第19期90-92,共3页Systems Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨虚挂线结合拖线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效。方法选取2018年1月—2019年12月该院收治的82例高位复杂性肛瘘患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法,分为对照组与观察组,各41例。对照组采用高位挂线低位切开术治疗,观察组采用虚挂线结合拖线术治疗,比较两组治疗效果。结果两组治疗总有效率(100.00%VS 100.00%)与复发率(2.44%VS 2.44%)差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P>0.05);观察组与对照组术后VAS评分[(4.89±0.77)分VS(6.12±0.85)分]、肛门失禁评分[(5.13±1.52)分VS(7.35±1.68)分](t=29.422、6.274,P<0.05);观察组与对照组术后治愈时间[(25.50±5.41)d VS(31.52±8.64)d](t=3.781,P<0.05);观察组与对照组创面面积[(6.17±1.20)cm2 VS(9.31±1.85)cm2]、瘢痕面积[(4.13±0.58)cm2 VS(6.98±1.47)cm2](t=9.118、11.548,P<0.05)。结论虚挂线结合拖线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效确切,且可使术后疼痛减轻,加快康复进程,有效保护患者肛门功能。Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of virtual thread hanging combined with thread dragging in the treatment of high complex anal fistula.Methods A total of 82 patients with high complex anal fistula admitted to the hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as research object,and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table method,with 41 cases in each group.The control group was treated with high-position thread-drawing and low-position incision.The observation group was treated with virtual thread-drawing combined with thread-drawing.The treatment effects of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate(100.00%VS 100.00%)and recurrence rate(2.44%VS 2.44%)between the two groups were not statistically different(χ2=0.000,P>0.05);the observation group and the control group had postoperative VAS scores[(4.89±0.77)points VS(6.12±0.85)points],anal incontinence score[(5.13±1.52)points VS(7.35±1.68)points](t=29.422,6.274,P<0.05);observation group and control group postoperative healing time[(25.50±5.41)d VS(31.52±8.64)d](t=3.781,P<0.05);wound area of observation group and control group[(6.17±1.20)cm2 VS(9.31±1.85)cm2],scar area[(4.13±0.58)cm2 VS(6.98±1.47)cm2](t=9.118,11.548,P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of thread-drawing and thread-drawing has a definite clinical effect in the treatment of high complex anal fistula,and can reduce postoperative pain,speed up the recovery process,and effectively protect the patient's anal function.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145